
SLAPP035 – Understanding the Public Interest Requirement
Apr 21, 2025 - 23:21
Radio and PodcastLive Radio & Podcasts
In Episode 24 of the California SLAPP Law Podcast, we tackle two important anti-SLAPP issues. Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism The conventional wisdom until now, as expressed in cases such...
SLAPP024 – Supreme Court Clarifies Whether Amended Complaint Resets 60-Day Clock for Anti-SLAPP Motion is an episode from California SLAPP Law by Aaron Morris: Anti-SLAPP Attorney. In Episode 24 of the California SLAPP Law Podcast, we tackl...
This episode belongs to California SLAPP Law.
Use the player on this page to stream the episode online.
Published Mar 26, 2018, 23:35 long, audio available.
In Episode 24 of the California SLAPP Law Podcast, we tackle two important anti-SLAPP issues. Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism The conventional wisdom until now, as expressed in cases such as Yu v. Signet Bank/Virginia, was that an amended complaint creates an new 60-day period to file an anti-SLAPP motion. Then along came the Court of Appeal decision of Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism. In that case, the plaintiff originally sued on two causes of action, to which the defendant demurrered. When the plaintiff filed a third amended complaint, which added two new causes of action, the defendant finally filed an anti-SLAPP motion, challenging all the claims, including the two that had been there all along. The trial court refused to consider the challenge to the previously existing claims, stating they were past the 60 days since they could have been previously challenged. The Supreme Court agreed. This is a quantum shift in the prior case law, but will the consequences be as severe as the holding seems to indicate? Listen to Episode 24 to find out, and for the best strategies for dealing with the Newport Harbor reasoning. Dowling v. Zimmerman Certainly not a new case, but we use it to discuss whether an appeal stays collection of costs and attorney fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion. The post SLAPP024 – Supreme Court Clarifies Whether Amended Complaint Resets 60-Day Clock for Anti-SLAPP Motion appeared first on California SLAPP Law .
You can listen to SLAPP024 – Supreme Court Clarifies Whether Amended Complaint Resets 60-Day Clock for Anti-SLAPP Motion online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.
SLAPP024 – Supreme Court Clarifies Whether Amended Complaint Resets 60-Day Clock for Anti-SLAPP Motion is an episode from California SLAPP Law by Aaron Morris: Anti-SLAPP Attorney.
This episode is 23:35 long.
This episode was published on Mar 26, 2018.
Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.
Yes. This page shows related episodes from California SLAPP Law when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.
You can listen to SLAPP024 – Supreme Court Clarifies Whether Amended Complaint Resets 60-Day Clock for Anti-SLAPP Motion on this page when the episode audio is available from the podcast feed.
SLAPP024 – Supreme Court Clarifies Whether Amended Complaint Resets 60-Day Clock for Anti-SLAPP Motion is from California SLAPP Law by Aaron Morris: Anti-SLAPP Attorney.
Published Mar 26, 2018 and 23:35 long