SLAPP029 – Can Attorneys Sue Their Clients for Malicious Prosecution After a Fee Dispute?

In episode 28, we discussed the attorney who sued his own client for malicious prosecution. The client had challenged the fees charged by the attorney by way of the informal fee arbitration process, and when he lost the attorney turned around and sued for malicious prosecution. Incredibly, the court denied our motion, so we had to take it up on appeal. The Court of Appeal agreed with our position that a fee arbitration cannot be the predicate for a malicious prosecution case, and therefore the attorney could not possibly prevail on the second prong of the anti-SLAPP analysis. In Episode 29, we discuss the court’s decision, as well as the motion for attorney fees that followed. The attorney provided a 65-page report from an expert witness who challenged our fees and hourly rate, but the judge was having none of it. The post SLAPP029 – Can Attorneys Sue Their Clients for Malicious Prosecution After a Fee Dispute? appeared first on California SLAPP Law .

You can listen to SLAPP029 – Can Attorneys Sue Their Clients for Malicious Prosecution After a Fee Dispute? online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.

SLAPP029 – Can Attorneys Sue Their Clients for Malicious Prosecution After a Fee Dispute? is an episode from California SLAPP Law by Aaron Morris: Anti-SLAPP Attorney.

This episode is 18:13 long.

This episode was published on Mar 22, 2021.

Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.

Yes. This page shows related episodes from California SLAPP Law when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.