SLAPP032 – The 3 Most-Often Miscited Anti-SLAPP Cases

We begin Episode 32 with the discussion of how Morris & Stone just defeated an anti-SLAPP motion. I reveal the common (and fatal) mistake made by defense counsel when they pursue anti-SLAPP motions. And on the topic of mistakes, based on my prior article , we turn to the three cases that counsel almost always cite improperly when defending against an anti-SLAPP motion. Listen and find out what these three cases really stand for: Nguyen-Lam v. Cao (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 858. Weinberg v. Feisel (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 1122. Flatley v. Mauro (2006) 39 Cal.4th 299. Finally, in the after-show, I reveal a successful strategy to obtain a trial continuance, even when the judge has already said no. The post SLAPP032 – The 3 Most-Often Miscited Anti-SLAPP Cases appeared first on California SLAPP Law .

You can listen to SLAPP032 – The 3 Most-Often Miscited Anti-SLAPP Cases online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.

SLAPP032 – The 3 Most-Often Miscited Anti-SLAPP Cases is an episode from California SLAPP Law by Aaron Morris: Anti-SLAPP Attorney.

This episode is 29:26 long.

This episode was published on Jun 20, 2021.

Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.

Yes. This page shows related episodes from California SLAPP Law when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.