SLAPP033 – How to Defeat an anti-SLAPP Motion with Inadmissible Evidence

In Episode 33 of the California SLAPP Law Podcast, we revisit the California Supreme Court decision of Sweetwater Union High School District v. Gilbane Building Co. Our client was sued by an attorney, and we had the action dismissed by way of an anti-SLAPP motion. The attorney appealed, and in his briefs, he never mentioned the Sweetwater holding, and we sure were not going to bring it up. The Court of Appeal brought it up anyway. Would the attorney be able to reverse the ruling, based on evidence that might be admissible at trial? We also discuss how sometimes the best thing to do is nothing. We were brought in to oppose an anti-SLAPP motion, but when the trial court kept continuing the hearing, I told the client, “wait for it, wait for it . . .” And I tell the tale of nice woman who ran afoul of the anti-SLAPP statute with her cross-complaint, and was faced with a massive attorney fee application. She could not afford to hire us, but a little guidance from the wings saved her from disaster. The post SLAPP033 – How to Defeat an anti-SLAPP Motion with Inadmissible Evidence appeared first on California SLAPP Law .

You can listen to SLAPP033 – How to Defeat an anti-SLAPP Motion with Inadmissible Evidence online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.

SLAPP033 – How to Defeat an anti-SLAPP Motion with Inadmissible Evidence is an episode from California SLAPP Law by Aaron Morris: Anti-SLAPP Attorney.

This episode is 20:15 long.

This episode was published on Sep 19, 2022.

Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.

Yes. This page shows related episodes from California SLAPP Law when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.