SLAPP019 – Five Best Published Anti-SLAPP Decisions (so far) in 2016

On Episode 19 of the California SLAPP Law Podcast, we go through my five favorite reported anti-SLAPP decisions from the first half of 2016. But first we begin with a cautionary tale of an attorney who is being sued for malpractice for failing to have me review his complaint before it was filed! (OK, there’s a back story here, so be sure to listen to this episode to find out what I’m talking about.) Then, we turn to the five best published anti-SLAPP decisions from the first half of 2016. The bold cases are the top five; the non-bolded are other cases I discuss as well. Lanz v. Goldstone (2015) 243 Cal.App.4th 441 Another cautionary tale, this time of an attorney who followed the old adage, “the best defense is a good offense.” He tried to intimidate an attorney from seeking his legal fees, and bought himself a malicious prosecution action in the process. You’ll learn a lot about malicious prosecution actions and under what circumstances they can survive an anti-SLAPP motion. Bertero v. National General Corp. (1974) 13 Cal.3d 43 Speaking of malicious prosecution actions, this is the seminal case. Sierra Club Foundation v. Graham (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 1135 “When the proceeding terminates other than on the merits, the court must examine the REASONS for termination to see if the disposition reflects the opinion of the court OR THE PROSECUTING PARTY that the action would not succeed.” Karnazes v. Ares (2016) 244 Cal.App.4th 344 Speaking of over-pleading, our second case is Karnazes v. Ares , decided by the Second District in January of 2016. In this case, the plaintiff alleged 22 – count em – 22 causes of action against the defendants. Karnazes lost to an anti-SLAPP motion, but made some interesting arguments in opposition to that motion. Sweetwater Union School District v. Gilbane Building Company (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 19 Are political bribes protected by the anti-SLAPP statute? Listen to find out (and the answer will likely surprise you). And find out how you can support an anti-SLAPP motion with declarations without using declarations. Crossroads Investors v. Federal National Mortgage Association (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 529 It may look like litigation, and it may quack like litigation, but that doesn’t necessarily make it litigation for purposes of the litigation privilege and the first prong of the anti-SLAPP analysis. JM Manufacturing v. Phillips & Cohen (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 87 Yet one more action against an attorney; in this case an attorney who was so proud of his firm’s trial victory that he published a press release and bought the firm a defamation action. It was a split decision. And finally, in the after show, I provide an appeal tip that might save you from some embarrassment. The post SLAPP019 – Five Best Published Anti-SLAPP Decisions (so far) in 2016 appeared first on California SLAPP Law .

You can listen to SLAPP019 – Five Best Published Anti-SLAPP Decisions (so far) in 2016 online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.

SLAPP019 – Five Best Published Anti-SLAPP Decisions (so far) in 2016 is an episode from California SLAPP Law by Aaron Morris: Anti-SLAPP Attorney.

This episode is 39:15 long.

This episode was published on Jun 9, 2016.

Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.

Yes. This page shows related episodes from California SLAPP Law when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.