SLAPP018 – All You Need to Know About Anti-SLAPP Motions in Federal Court

In episode 18 of the California SLAPP Law Podcast, I discuss an anti-SLAPP motion I decided NOT to pursue, and why. We discuss the case of Weinberg v. Feisel (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 1122. Then we dive deep into the pros, cons, and frustrations of bringing anti-SLAPP motions in Federal Court. Since 1999, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that the California anti-SLAPP statute can be applied to cases in Federal Court, but the motion you bring there is a very different animal from what is pursued in State Court. As part of our discussion on anti-SLAPP motions in Federal Court, we cover the following cases: Erie Railroad Company v. Tompkins (1938) 304 U.S. 64 Swift v. Tyson (1842) 41 U.S. 1 United States Newsham v. Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. (1999) 171 F.3d 1208 Makaeff v. Trump University (2013) 715 F.3d 254 Verizon Delaware, Inc. v. Covad Communications (2004) 377 F.3d 1081 Globetrotter Software, Inc. v. Elan Computer Group (2004) 362 F.3d 1367 The post SLAPP018 – All You Need to Know About Anti-SLAPP Motions in Federal Court appeared first on California SLAPP Law .

You can listen to SLAPP018 – All You Need to Know About Anti-SLAPP Motions in Federal Court online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.

SLAPP018 – All You Need to Know About Anti-SLAPP Motions in Federal Court is an episode from California SLAPP Law by Aaron Morris: Anti-SLAPP Attorney.

This episode is 31:13 long.

This episode was published on May 30, 2016.

Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.

Yes. This page shows related episodes from California SLAPP Law when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.