SLAPP016 – Appealing a Ruling on an Anti-SLAPP Motion

In Episode 16 of the California SLAPP Law Podcast, we discuss (1) when you can join with another defendant’s anti-SLAPP motion, and whether it is a good strategy to do so; (2) what the Courts of Appeal are doing to deal with all the appeals from anti-SLAPP motions; and (3) likely changes to the automatic right of appeal. We dive deep into the case of Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Oracle (2015), in which the Sixth District decried the abuse of the automatic right of appeal from rulings on anti-SLAPP motions, and took the unusual step of suggesting to the California Legislature how it could be fixed. The California Society of Entertainment Lawyers has offered the change set forth in the decision as a proposal to the legislature via the Conference of California Bar Associations. We also discuss the cases of Decker v. UD Registry, Inc. and Barak v. Quisenberry Law Firm , and examine their very different views on whether one defendant can join another defendant’s anti-SLAPP motion. Finally, in the post show, I introduce you to a brand new service that provides access to prior tentative rulings of trial court judges, which are a great resource when preparing important motions that will be heard by those judges. The post SLAPP016 – Appealing a Ruling on an Anti-SLAPP Motion appeared first on California SLAPP Law .

You can listen to SLAPP016 – Appealing a Ruling on an Anti-SLAPP Motion online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.

SLAPP016 – Appealing a Ruling on an Anti-SLAPP Motion is an episode from California SLAPP Law by Aaron Morris: Anti-SLAPP Attorney.

This episode is 28:25 long.

This episode was published on Nov 4, 2015.

Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.

Yes. This page shows related episodes from California SLAPP Law when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.