
Radio and PodcastLive Radio & Podcasts
Urias-Orellana v. Bondi (Level of Deference for Immigration Appeals)
Send us Fan Mail In Urias‑Orellana v. Bondi , the Supreme Court unanimously held that courts of appeals must apply the substantial-evidence standard when reviewing the Board of Immigration Appeals’ determination that a s...
About This Episode
Urias-Orellana v. Bondi (Level of Deference for Immigration Appeals) is an episode from Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS) by RJ Dieken. Send us Fan Mail In Urias‑Orellana v. Bondi , the Supreme Court unanimously held that courts of a...
This episode belongs to Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS).
Use the player on this page to stream the episode online.
Published Mar 6, 2026, 5:58 long, audio available.
Questions About This Episode
What is Urias-Orellana v. Bondi (Level of Deference for Immigration Appeals) about?
Send us Fan Mail In Urias‑Orellana v. Bondi , the Supreme Court unanimously held that courts of appeals must apply the substantial-evidence standard when reviewing the Board of Immigration Appeals’ determination that a set of facts does not amount to “persecution” under the Immigration and Nationality Act. The Court explained that although the persecution determination involves applying legal standards to facts—a mixed question—Congress, through 8 U.S.C. §1252(b)(4)(B), required deferential review of the agency’s conclusion unless the evidence compels a contrary result. In addressing the petitioners’ reliance on Wilkinson v. Garland and Guerrero‑Lasprilla v. Barr , the Court clarified that those cases concerned jurisdiction , holding that mixed questions can qualify as “questions of law” that remain reviewable despite the INA’s jurisdiction-stripping provisions. But the Court emphasized that classifying an issue as a “question of law” for purposes of whether courts may review it at all does not determine how courts must review it once jurisdiction exists; the standard of review is instead governed by §1252(b)(4)(B), which mandates substantial-evidence deference to the agency. Applying that deferential standard, the Court affirmed the First Circuit’s decision upholding the denial of asylum because the record did not compel a finding that the threats and harm described rose to the level of persecution.
Where can I listen to Urias-Orellana v. Bondi (Level of Deference for Immigration Appeals)?
You can listen to Urias-Orellana v. Bondi (Level of Deference for Immigration Appeals) online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.
Which podcast is Urias-Orellana v. Bondi (Level of Deference for Immigration Appeals) from?
Urias-Orellana v. Bondi (Level of Deference for Immigration Appeals) is an episode from Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS) by RJ Dieken.
How long is this episode?
This episode is 5:58 long.
When was this episode published?
This episode was published on Mar 6, 2026.
Can I save Urias-Orellana v. Bondi (Level of Deference for Immigration Appeals) for later?
Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.
Are there related episodes from Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS)?
Yes. This page shows related episodes from Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS) when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.
Quick Answers About This Episode
Where can I listen to Urias-Orellana v. Bondi (Level of Deference for Immigration Appeals)?
You can listen to Urias-Orellana v. Bondi (Level of Deference for Immigration Appeals) on this page when the episode audio is available from the podcast feed.
Which podcast is this episode from?
Urias-Orellana v. Bondi (Level of Deference for Immigration Appeals) is from Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS) by RJ Dieken.
What are the episode details?
Published Mar 6, 2026 and 5:58 long