Hencely v. Fluor Corp (Wartime contractor immunity)

Send us Fan Mail A U.S. Army specialist injured while stopping a Taliban suicide bomber at a base in Afghanistan sued military contractor Fluor Corporation for negligence after the attacker—an Afghan hired under the military’s “Afghan First” program—was allegedly poorly supervised. Lower courts dismissed the case, holding that state-law claims against contractors are preempted during wartime under the Federal Tort Claims Act’s combatant-activities exception. The Supreme Court rejected that view, ruling that the claims are not preempted because neither the Constitution nor federal statutes bar them, and the FTCA exception does not extend to contractors. Relying on Boyle v. United Technologies Corp. was misplaced, the Court explained, because preemption applies only where a contractor follows specific government directives, not where it allegedly violates them. Since Fluor’s conduct was neither ordered nor authorized by the military—and resolving the case would not second-guess military decisions—there is no significant conflict with federal interests, and traditional state tort law may proceed.

You can listen to Hencely v. Fluor Corp (Wartime contractor immunity) online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.

Hencely v. Fluor Corp (Wartime contractor immunity) is an episode from Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS) by RJ Dieken.

This episode is 5:50 long.

This episode was published on Apr 25, 2026.

Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.

Yes. This page shows related episodes from Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS) when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.