Chiles v. Salazar (First Amendment & talk therapy)

Send us Fan Mail The Court held that Colorado’s ban on “conversion therapy,” as applied to a licensed counselor providing only talk therapy, likely violates the First Amendment because it regulates speech based on content and viewpoint. Writing for the majority, Justice Gorsuch concluded that the law does not merely regulate professional conduct but directly restricts what the counselor may say to clients—permitting affirming discussions of a client’s sexual orientation or gender identity while prohibiting speech that seeks to change them. Such viewpoint-based restrictions on speech are presumptively unconstitutional and must satisfy strict scrutiny, not the deferential rational-basis review applied by the lower courts. The Court rejected the idea that “professional speech” receives lesser protection and found that Colorado’s law does not fall within any recognized exception (such as regulating conduct, commercial disclosures, or historically unprotected categories of speech). Because the Tenth Circuit applied the wrong level of scrutiny, the Court reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

You can listen to Chiles v. Salazar (First Amendment & talk therapy) online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.

Chiles v. Salazar (First Amendment & talk therapy) is an episode from Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS) by RJ Dieken.

This episode is 9:40 long.

This episode was published on Apr 1, 2026.

Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.

Yes. This page shows related episodes from Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS) when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.