
Radio and PodcastLive Radio & Podcasts
GEO Group v. Menocal (Civil Procedure/Appealability)
Send us Fan Mail Petitioner GEO Group operates a private detention facility in Aurora, Colorado, under a contract with U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Respondent Alejandro Menocal, a former detainee at t...
About This Episode
GEO Group v. Menocal (Civil Procedure/Appealability) is an episode from Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS) by RJ Dieken. Send us Fan Mail Petitioner GEO Group operates a private detention facility in Aurora, Colorado, under a contract...
This episode belongs to Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS).
Use the player on this page to stream the episode online.
Published Feb 26, 2026, 8:14 long, audio available.
Questions About This Episode
What is GEO Group v. Menocal (Civil Procedure/Appealability) about?
Send us Fan Mail Petitioner GEO Group operates a private detention facility in Aurora, Colorado, under a contract with U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Respondent Alejandro Menocal, a former detainee at the Aurora facility, initiated this class action, alleging GEO’s work policies for detainees violate a federal bar on forced labor and Colorado’s prohibition on unjust enrichment. GEO responded that the suit must be dismissed under Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Constr. Co., 309 U. S. 18, which held that a federal contractor cannot be held liable for conduct that the Government has lawfully “authorized and directed” the contractor to perform. Id., at 20–21. GEO argued that ICE had authorized and directed it to carry out the challenged labor policies. But the District Court did not read GEO’s contract with the Government to instruct GEO to adopt those policies. The District Court thus concluded that the Yearsley doctrine did not relieve GEO of legal responsibility and a trial would be necessary. GEO immediately filed an appeal, which the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, holding that an order denying Yearsley protection does not qualify for interlocutory review under Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U. S. 541. Held: Because Yearsley provides federal contractors a potential merits defense rather than an immunity from suit, a pretrial order denying Yearsley protection is not immediately appealable. Pp. 3–12. Read by Jake Leahy , more here .
Where can I listen to GEO Group v. Menocal (Civil Procedure/Appealability)?
You can listen to GEO Group v. Menocal (Civil Procedure/Appealability) online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.
Which podcast is GEO Group v. Menocal (Civil Procedure/Appealability) from?
GEO Group v. Menocal (Civil Procedure/Appealability) is an episode from Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS) by RJ Dieken.
How long is this episode?
This episode is 8:14 long.
When was this episode published?
This episode was published on Feb 26, 2026.
Can I save GEO Group v. Menocal (Civil Procedure/Appealability) for later?
Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.
Are there related episodes from Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS)?
Yes. This page shows related episodes from Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS) when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.
Quick Answers About This Episode
Where can I listen to GEO Group v. Menocal (Civil Procedure/Appealability)?
You can listen to GEO Group v. Menocal (Civil Procedure/Appealability) on this page when the episode audio is available from the podcast feed.
Which podcast is this episode from?
GEO Group v. Menocal (Civil Procedure/Appealability) is from Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS) by RJ Dieken.
What are the episode details?
Published Feb 26, 2026 and 8:14 long