A Lost Opportunity: $8.2 Trillion on New Nukes cuts CO2 only 9%?
Nov 17, 2016 - 32:52
Radio and PodcastLive Radio & Podcasts
Before its triple meltdown, the nuclear power industry claimed that the Fukushima Daiichi atomic reactors were earthquake proof – what the nuke proponents call ‘seismically qualified’. Fukushima Daiichi owner, Tokyo Elec...
Shake, Rattle, and Roll: Seismic Report Part 1 is an episode from Fairewinds Energy Education Podcast by Fairewinds Energy Education. Before its triple meltdown, the nuclear power industry claimed that the Fukushima Daiichi atomic reactors...
This episode belongs to Fairewinds Energy Education Podcast.
Use the player on this page to stream the episode online.
Published May 19, 2016, 31:00 long, audio available.
Before its triple meltdown, the nuclear power industry claimed that the Fukushima Daiichi atomic reactors were earthquake proof – what the nuke proponents call ‘seismically qualified’. Fukushima Daiichi owner, Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), conducted what atomic utility owners call a “Maximum Credible Assessment (MCA)” (or what the Fairewinds Crew calls the “Maximum Cost Affordable”). According to the nuclear industry, the MCA assesses the maximum magnitude of an earthquake or natural disaster based on industry best guesses in relation to anticipated costs for repair construction budgets. Therefore, when a nuclear plant owner like Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) claims that its Diablo Canyon atomic reactors are earthquake proof… that’s not exactly true. What these atomic power producers are really claiming is that they have constructed an atomic reactor that should be able to withstand the worst possible earthquake that corporations believe is affordable. The aftershock earthquake that hit Fukushima Daiichi was a magnitude 6.6 that originated from a magnitude 9 earthquake offshore. As we continue to witness the ongoing tragedy created by the triple meltdown at Fukushima Daiichi, we also witness an atomic reactor deemed earthquake proof and ‘seismically qualified’ by the Maximum Credible Assessment suffering a major disaster and meltdown due to an earthquake less than the magnitude limit that the atomic reactor was built to withstand. In this podcast, the Fairewinds Crew discusses seismicity risks and atomic power with Fairewinds Science Advisor Dr. Leslie Kanat, a double Fulbright scholar and professor of geology at Johnson State College. Dr. Kanat explains the difference between fault and subduction zones, why earthquakes are near impossible to predict, and how history can and does repeat itself.
You can listen to Shake, Rattle, and Roll: Seismic Report Part 1 online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.
Shake, Rattle, and Roll: Seismic Report Part 1 is an episode from Fairewinds Energy Education Podcast by Fairewinds Energy Education.
This episode is 31:00 long.
This episode was published on May 19, 2016.
Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.
Yes. This page shows related episodes from Fairewinds Energy Education Podcast when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.
You can listen to Shake, Rattle, and Roll: Seismic Report Part 1 on this page when the episode audio is available from the podcast feed.
Shake, Rattle, and Roll: Seismic Report Part 1 is from Fairewinds Energy Education Podcast by Fairewinds Energy Education.
Published May 19, 2016 and 31:00 long