
Radio and PodcastLive Radio & Podcasts
Argument, Evidence and Continuity in the Augar Report
Released in May 2019, the Augar report was a result of a 6 person panel chaired by Philip Augar and was the first in England to have a remit for the whole of tertiary education. Parry argues whether its features are the...
About This Episode
Argument, Evidence and Continuity in the Augar Report is an episode from Department of Education Public Seminars by Oxford University. Released in May 2019, the Augar report was a result of a 6 person panel chaired by Philip Augar and was t...
This episode belongs to Department of Education Public Seminars.
Use the player on this page to stream the episode online.
Published Nov 19, 2019, 86:17 long, audio available.
Questions About This Episode
What is Argument, Evidence and Continuity in the Augar Report about?
Released in May 2019, the Augar report was a result of a 6 person panel chaired by Philip Augar and was the first in England to have a remit for the whole of tertiary education. Parry argues whether its features are the nature of expert panels. The use of expert panels to advise governments is a favoured form of policy inquiry process. In higher education, especially in the UK, they have replaced committees of inquiry in the tradition of Robbins and Dearing. In further education, there were no such independent inquiries in the first place. Although sitting inside a government-led review and observing its no-go areas, the six-person panel chaired by Philip Augar (which reported in May) was the first, at least in England, to have a remit for the whole of tertiary education. In assessing the system of higher and further education in England, and making recommendations about how it might be strengthened, the panel needed to assemble and generate evidence on a wide front. The scope of the task was worthy of a larger and longer inquiry. The result was a report short on policy history and lesson-drawing but with data and analysis marshalled in support of its core contentions. Most of its recommendations were financial and regulatory. None were structural. The present architecture of tertiary education was deemed fit for purpose. Here also was an inquiry process aligned to existing government policy for a two-type system of academic and technical education. That policy was the creation of another government-convened panel (chaired by David Sainsbury). Two of its members subsequently served on the Augar team. Such features, it will be argued, are of the nature of expert panels. The work they accomplish should be judged accordingly.
Where can I listen to Argument, Evidence and Continuity in the Augar Report?
You can listen to Argument, Evidence and Continuity in the Augar Report online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.
Which podcast is Argument, Evidence and Continuity in the Augar Report from?
Argument, Evidence and Continuity in the Augar Report is an episode from Department of Education Public Seminars by Oxford University.
How long is this episode?
This episode is 86:17 long.
When was this episode published?
This episode was published on Nov 19, 2019.
Can I save Argument, Evidence and Continuity in the Augar Report for later?
Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.
Are there related episodes from Department of Education Public Seminars?
Yes. This page shows related episodes from Department of Education Public Seminars when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.
Quick Answers About This Episode
Where can I listen to Argument, Evidence and Continuity in the Augar Report?
You can listen to Argument, Evidence and Continuity in the Augar Report on this page when the episode audio is available from the podcast feed.
Which podcast is this episode from?
Argument, Evidence and Continuity in the Augar Report is from Department of Education Public Seminars by Oxford University.
What are the episode details?
Published Nov 19, 2019 and 86:17 long