
Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc.
A case that was settled before trial regarding whether or not a New Jersey township's redevelopment plan of an historically poor area violat...
Radio and PodcastLive Radio & PodcastsOpening Radio and Podcast...

Radio and PodcastLive Radio & PodcastsFetching podcast shows and categories...
Radio and PodcastLive Radio & PodcastsFetching podcast episodes...

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

A case that was settled before trial regarding whether or not a New Jersey township's redevelopment plan of an historically poor area violat...

A case which the Court dismissed concerning whether or not the Oklahoma legislature violated a woman's rights to an abortion by restricting...

A case which the Court dismissed regarding whether or not the three-year statute of limitations set forth in the Securities Act of 1933 is s...

A case in which the Court held that a party is not liable for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) unless the party has also violate...

A case in which the Court found that the San Diego Police Department's search of an arrested gang member's cell phone pictures without a war...

A case in which the Court found that the San Diego Police Department's search of an arrested gang member's cell phone pictures without a war...

A case in which the Court held that a public employee's truthful testimony under subpoena in a trial is citizen speech and thus cannot be us...

A case in which the Court held that, although a U.S. patent may be vague in certain areas, it is still protected by patent law as long as th...

A case in which the Court found that the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act pre-empts statutes of limitat...

A case in which the Court held that an allegation of improper purpose was not sufficient to entitle a taxpayer to examine IRS officials.

A case in which the Court held that Aereo, Inc. violated federal copyright law by allowing users to stream content produced by major cable c...

A case in which the Court held that pre-enforcement challenges are justiciable when evidence indicates that threatened enforcement of the la...

A case in which the Court held that, under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, property held within the US by foreign nations cannot be at...

A case in which the Court held that it is the duty of the court system to harmonize statutes, and that barring one applicable statute by use...

A case in which the Court held that a trustee of an employee stock ownership plan is subject to the same duty of prudence as the trustee of...

A case in which the Court held that, to find someone guilty of bank fraud, only one of the two bank fraud statutes must be met, not both.

A case in which the Court found that patent laws should not place restraints on abstract ideas that form the "building blocks of human ingen...

A case in which the Court held that Secret Service agents did not break any "clearly established" laws in their efforts to protect the Presi...

A case in which the Court decided that the Affordable Care Act's requirement of for-profit corporations to supply its employees with contrac...

A case in which the Court held that the U.S. Bankruptcy Code does not exempt inherited retirement accounts from a debtor's estate in bankrup...

A case in which the Court held that there is no undue burden in allowing defendants in securities fraud cases from presenting evidence regar...

A case in which the Court held that police using deadly force to prevent a crime endangering the general public are granted qualified immuni...

A case in which the Court held that the execution of intellectually disabled individuals violated the protection against cruel and unusual p...

A case in which the Court held that a district court is the best place to determine whether or not a lawsuit is objectively baseless.

A case in which the Court defined "exceptional" cases as ones that simply stand out from others due to a frivolous nature related to its leg...

A case in which the Court held that, under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, individuals accused of property crime must pay “an amount...

A case in which the Court held that, under the Clean Air Act, the EPA is not required to include greenhouse gas emissions every time it ment...

A case in which the Court ruled that to recover restitution, either the government or the victim must establish a causal relationship betwee...

A case in which the Court held that a firearm purchaser's intent to sell their gun to another buyer is necessary information for the seller'...

A case in which the Court held that the doctrine of laches could not be used to prevent a copyright suit that seeks relief for damages that...

A case in which the Court held that the the First Amendment prohibits the collection of union dues from home health care providers who do no...

A case in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment does not require an officer who received information regarding drunken or reckless...

A case in which the Court held that a Tennessee man's conviction of domestic violence under state law also prevented him from legally posses...

A case in which the Court ruled that the Massachusetts legislature violated the freedom of speech protections of the First Amendment when it...

A case in which the Court held that the General Railroad Right-of-Way Act of 1875 guaranteed the federal government easements for federally-...

A case in which the Court found that a bankruptcy judge may hear arguments and file a report with a district court for "non-core" bankruptcy...

A case in which the Court found that severance payments made to employees who were unwillingly laid off are taxable under the Federal Insura...

A case in which the Court further defined the limitations on the presidential powers granted by the Recess Appointments Clause.

A case in which the Court found that a bankruptcy court may not enforce specific statutory exceptions.

A case in which the Court held that a guilty plea negates a person's rights against self-incrimination in court.

A case in which the Court held that the policy of equitable tolling does not apply to the statute of limitations outlined in the Hauge Conve...

A case in which the Court held that the EPA has an absolute mandate to require states to meet federal standards set forth in the Clean Air A...

A case in which the Court held that the Immigration and Nationality Act does not allow children who have submitted an application for a visa...

A case in which the Court held that a district court's decision on a case based on merit is a "final answer" in terms of an eventual appeal.

A case in which the Court ruled that the Aviation and Transportation Security Act protects transportation officials from false statements, a...

A case in which the Court ruled that a federal statute can be enforced on a portion of military land that is subject to a public roadway eas...

A case in which the Court held that the Lanham Act allowed any party to sue for injuries relating to false advertising, as long as the party...

A case in which the Court held that the Airline Deregulation Act preempts claims arising from a frequent flier complaint based on price, rou...

A case in which the Court held that it is the duty of the arbitrating party in a contract lawsuit to interpret provisions outlined in the co...

A case in which the Court held that Indian tribes have sovereign immunity that can only be revoked by Congress, and that the immunity extend...