PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing

U.S. Supreme Court 2010 Term Arguments

Mar 30, 2011Government & Organizations

A case in which the Court held that generic drug makers cannot be sued for not warning about potentially dangerous side effects on their drug labels, even when they follow federal rules that only require their labels to...

Related Episodes

Continue listening to more episodes from U.S. Supreme Court 2010 Term Arguments.

Stok & Associates, P.A. v. Citibank, N.A.

Dec 23, 2015

A case the Court dismissed, which would have considered whether under the Federal Arbitration Act, a part...

Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan

Apr 27, 2011

A case in which the Court held that the Nevada law requiring elected officials to disqualify themselves w...

Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.

Apr 26, 2011

A case in which the Court held that a Vermont statute banning the sale, transmission or use of prescripti...

McNeill v. United States

Apr 25, 2011

A case in which the Court held that a federal sentencing court must determine whether an offense under st...

Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co.

Apr 25, 2011

A case in which the Court held that securities fraud plaintiffs need not prove loss causation in order to...

United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation

Apr 20, 2011

A case in which the Court held that the fiduciary exception to the attorney-client privilege does not app...

American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. Connecticut

Apr 19, 2011

A case in which the Court that held the Clean Air Act bars suits by governmental bodies and private parti...

Tapia v. United States

Apr 18, 2011

A case in which the Court held that a district court may not give a defendant a longer prison sentence ba...