Supreme Court Preview 2020: Highlights and Perspectives
Sep 18, 2020 - 00:58:47
Radio and PodcastLive Radio & PodcastsThe 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol are among the most important human rights documents of the post-WW II period. Yet the universalization of the refugee status after the 1967 Protocol has given rise to a s...
Seyla Benhabib, "The End of the 1951 Refugee Convention?" is an episode from The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Podcast by UChicagoLaw. The 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol are among the most important human rights do...
This episode belongs to The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Podcast.
Use the player on this page to stream the episode online.
Published Jan 27, 2020, 01:07:51 long, audio available.
The 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol are among the most important human rights documents of the post-WW II period. Yet the universalization of the refugee status after the 1967 Protocol has given rise to a series of discrepancies between the letter of the Convention and the purposes it is being asked to serve. In particular, the five-protected categories specified by the Convention have come under criticism. There are also tensions between the Eurocentric discourse and jurisprudence of refugee protection and the fact that the largest numbers of the world’s refugees are housed in Third World Countries. With globalization of the refugee condition, new trends have also emerged: States seek to create measures of “non-entrée”—no access—to their territories by various modes of outsourcing monitoring and enforcement. These range from the installation of refugee processing centers in bordering countries and along the Mediterranean seacoast in particular, to the signing of special bilateral agreements to prevent refugees from accessing the states’ territory (as between the US and Mexico) and to the more radical measure of simply “excising” territory, that is, declaring it outside the bounds of the jurisdiction of that state. These trends, along with criminalization of the refugee status, have undermined the universal human promise of the “right to have rights” (Hannah Arendt). In conclusion I ask why cruelty is spreading in liberal democracies and discuss three normative responses to the current predicament: liberal nationalist, liberal internationalist and cosmopolitan interdependence. I suggest a fourth alternative which synthesizes elements of each. Seyla Benhabib is the Eugene Meyer Professor of Political Science and Professor of Philosophy at Yale University. This Dewey Lecture in Law and Philosophy was presented on January 15, 2020.
You can listen to Seyla Benhabib, "The End of the 1951 Refugee Convention?" online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.
Seyla Benhabib, "The End of the 1951 Refugee Convention?" is an episode from The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Podcast by UChicagoLaw.
This episode is 01:07:51 long.
This episode was published on Jan 27, 2020.
Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.
Yes. This page shows related episodes from The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Podcast when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.
You can listen to Seyla Benhabib, "The End of the 1951 Refugee Convention?" on this page when the episode audio is available from the podcast feed.
Seyla Benhabib, "The End of the 1951 Refugee Convention?" is from The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Podcast by UChicagoLaw.
Published Jan 27, 2020 and 01:07:51 long