
Radio and PodcastLive Radio & PodcastsFetching episode details...
Radio and PodcastLive Radio & PodcastsFetching episode details...
Radio and PodcastLive Radio & Podcasts
Introduction: Many medical education journals use Twitter to garner attention for their articles. The purpose of this study was to test the effects of tweeting on article page views and downloads. Methods: The authors co...
To tweet or not to tweet, that is the question: A randomized trial of Twitter effects in medical education is an episode from Science Says by Science Says. Introduction: Many medical education journals use Twitter to garner attention for th...
This episode belongs to Science Says.
Use the player on this page to stream the episode online.
Published Oct 30, 2019, audio available.
Introduction: Many medical education journals use Twitter to garner attention for their articles. The purpose of this study was to test the effects of tweeting on article page views and downloads. Methods: The authors conducted a randomized trial using Academic Medicine articles published in 2015. Beginning in February through May 2018, one article per day was randomly assigned to a Twitter (case) or control group. Daily, an individual tweet was generated for each article in the Twitter group that included the title, , and a link to the article. The link delivered users to the article’s landing page, which included immediate access to the HTML full text and a PDF link. The authors extracted HTML page views and PDF downloads from the publisher. To assess differences in page views and downloads between cases and controls, a time-centered approach was used, with outcomes measured at 1, 7, and 30 days. Results: In total, 189 articles (94 cases, 95 controls) were analyzed. After days 1 and 7, there were no statistically significant differences between cases and controls on any metric. On day 30, HTML page views exhibited a 63% increase for cases (M = 14.72, SD = 63.68) when compared to controls (M = 9.01, SD = 14.34; incident rate ratio = 1.63, p = 0.01). There were no differences between cases and controls for PDF downloads on day 30. Discussion: Contrary to the authors’ hypothesis, only one statistically significant difference in page views between the Twitter and control groups was found. These findings provide preliminary evidence that after 30 days a tweet can have a small positive effect on article page views. Maggio LA, Leroux TC, Artino AR Jr. To tweet or not to tweet, that is the question: A randomized trial of Twitter effects in medical education. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223992. Published 2019 Oct 16. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223992 This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. Sections of the Abstract, Introduction, and Discussion are presented in the Podcast.
You can listen to To tweet or not to tweet, that is the question: A randomized trial of Twitter effects in medical education online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.
To tweet or not to tweet, that is the question: A randomized trial of Twitter effects in medical education is an episode from Science Says by Science Says.
The episode duration depends on the source podcast feed and may not always be available.
This episode was published on Oct 30, 2019.
Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.
Yes. This page shows related episodes from Science Says when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.
You can listen to To tweet or not to tweet, that is the question: A randomized trial of Twitter effects in medical education on this page when the episode audio is available from the podcast feed.
To tweet or not to tweet, that is the question: A randomized trial of Twitter effects in medical education is from Science Says by Science Says.
Published Oct 30, 2019