
Episode 217: Except as to Part I(A) Yada Yada
We discuss the morality of concurring and dissenting. And the usual nonsense.
Radio and PodcastLive Radio & PodcastsOpening Radio and Podcast...

Radio and PodcastLive Radio & PodcastsFetching podcast shows and categories...
Radio and PodcastLive Radio & PodcastsFetching podcast episodes...

A podcast about law, law school, legal theory, and other nerdy things that interest us.

We discuss the morality of concurring and dissenting. And the usual nonsense.

Joe and Christian talk about the pandemic and, then, some nonsense.

We discuss the march on the Capitol and... all this.

In this holiday spectacular, we talk about small claims. In particular, would a court for small copyright claims be a good or bad thing? You...

Joe lowers the boom, and we start talking. In the 213th episode of this very serious podcast, we discuss: scams, flight simulators, flight,...

We discuss the Supreme Court's (I know, I know) decision in Roman Catholic Diocese v. Cuomo .

Is this thing on? What did we miss?

Just Joe and Christian on the pandemic, new articles, and spring break. Achieving A Fair and Effective COVID-19 Response: An Open Letter to...

We are joined by our student, Justin Van Orsdol, who has co-authored a paper with Christian about a new approach to the gun violence crisis....

We discuss a proposal by Sen. Hawley to abolish, more or less, the Federal Trade Commission, the agency that administers consumer protection...

Sometimes in law, as in other areas of life, we think we know something, but the more we think about, the more we realize we don't know it a...

Joe and Christian discuss Christian's latest paper, on the way we define and separate markets, including European football, campaign finance...

Christian calls Joe out of the blue to celebrate our sixth anniversary and to talk about heroes.

We discuss new calls to integrate church and state. The conversation ranges over liberalism, religion, religious zeal, and, obviously, some...

On immaturity, defensiveness, art, the intellect, models, and the self. And mailbag on scholarship and practice, Title VII, and Star Trek. I...

We discuss dictionaries, up and down on maps, and excellence in seminar conversation. Joseph Miller, Suggestions for Law School Seminars Sem...

Just Joe and Christian, lumbering into season 2, talking about tipping and fraud in the gig economy, bar exam fiascos, legal scholarship, an...

We kick off Season 2 with assorted nonsense before diving into our second SCOTUS round-up, which consists entirely of the Supreme Court's de...

We discuss items from the mailbag and go ahead and conduct our annual, absurd Supreme Court round-up (fifty minutes in). James Macleod, Ordi...

How would you feel if you found out you were unwittingly the subject of an experiment testing two alternatives? You got A, and another group...

We talk about LARPing, emotions, meaning, exam writing, grading, happiness, and other things. Lawrence S. Krieger and Kennon M. Sheldon, Wha...

Is the common law efficient? Richard Posner, among many others, has argued that it is, perhaps even without judges ever themselves focusing...

We dip back into the mailbag to discuss verdicts, unpublished opinions, "based off," canons and anti-canons, and more.

With Zahr Said and Jessica Silbey, we discuss new narrative forms, their setting, and their influence on law and legal education. How do the...

Fast on the heels of her last appearance, Carissa Hessick joins us to talk about corpus linguistics, which means... well, we debate this, bu...

At long last, we discuss originalism with one of its foremost proponents, Lawrence Solum. In this conversation, we focus on Larry's recent e...

After discussion of failing memory, mispronunciation of names, and legal scholarship, we turn to a very serious topic with our guest, Eric K...

Just Joe and Christian talking about, inter alia, a paper about judicial writing and practice by the late Judge Wald. Live to tape and shipp...

Kim Krawiec rejoins us to discuss "repugnant" transactions. One common target of this adjective is trade in human body parts. While on the o...

If you were charged with a crime, would you rather it be one written down by a legislature and codified in the tomes of a state's laws or on...

Jocelyn Simonson returns to the show to wake us up to the many public interests on both sides (and no sides and all sides) in criminal cases...

Exactly five years after our first show, we record a conversation on the ephemeral or perduring nature of podcasts and blogs, dockless scoot...

Brexit, China, international trade, security, distribution, resentment, madness, and coffee with Tim Meyer. Tim Meyer's faculty profile and...

Here's your Thanksgiving Holiday episode, perfect for travel and your other holiday needs. If you listen only for law-related content, you'l...

Episode 183: West Coast Model (guest Chris Elmendorf) Why is housing so expensive in major West Coast and northeastern cities? Not just more...

The publication of legal scholarship is, compared with that in other academic disciplines, is, well, weird. Almost all legal journals are ed...

We talk with our colleague Sandy Mayson about the use of algorithms in criminal law decisionmaking - and especially their troubling and diff...

Just Joe and Christian on: listener feedback (01:09), the Supreme Court confirmation crisis and constitutional structure (round one) (08:00)...

Joe becomes the guest guest and Mike Madison the guest host, as we talk about Joe's new research into the web of law and what citations tell...

This week, it's the latest edition of "Things Haven't Always Been Like This". Farah Peterson teaches us about the judges of the early 1800s...

It's our annual Supreme Court term roundup, with special guest Ian Samuel. We discuss, natch, one case, Carpenter v. United States, which co...

A full hour of pre-roll before our extended conversation (in the next episode) with Ian Samuel. Opening topics: Words, Joe's new paper, phon...

We're joined by Paul Gowder to discuss the rule of law, private power, and technology. We start, after important discussion of fishing bycat...

Just Joe and Christian on a double-album of an episode. Lots of nonsense and a smattering of sense, including: notaries public, internationa...

The Constitution requires the President to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." Phrases like "faithful execution" are hardly un...

If we were starting from scratch, as our guest Aziz Huq puts it, how should our constitution deal with criminality by high government offici...

Steve Vladeck rejoins us on ... lots of things. Christian returns from a conference abroad, french fries, standing, Iceland, patents and tri...

We talk with Charles Barzun about what it means to be a legal pragmatist. But first we start with the ending and then talk John Hodgman, the...

Back with a casual conversation about exams, faculties and their politics, and other random things. This show’s links: None.

Do you believe that once upon a time, before the rise of the administrative state, our legislature mainly legislated, our executive just car...