Should Unelected Judges Be Deciding National Policy?

Every week, headlines tell us that a single federal judge has blocked a presidential order—sometimes halting major policies for years. But should that be possible? Is it democratic? In this episode, we dig into the rise and fall of universal injunctions —a little-known legal tool that allowed one judge to freeze nationwide policy. With a recent Supreme Court decision, those injunctions are now off the table, but the ruling raises bigger questions: Has the Court consolidated power for itself? What does this mean for the balance between the executive branch, lower courts, and the justices in Washington? We talk with Jack Goldsmith , former Assistant Attorney General and Harvard Law professor, to unpack the legal mechanics, political stakes, and the hidden negotiations between the Supreme Court and the presidency. The result is a story about law, politics, and power that goes far beyond the headlines. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

You can listen to Should Unelected Judges Be Deciding National Policy? online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.

Should Unelected Judges Be Deciding National Policy? is an episode from Not Another Politics Podcast by University of Chicago Podcast Network.

This episode is 01:09:52 long.

This episode was published on Sep 12, 2025.

Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.

Yes. This page shows related episodes from Not Another Politics Podcast when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.