Radio and PodcastRadio and PodcastLive Radio & Podcasts
The Jury: Moral Innovation or Historic Relic? artwork
Religion & Spirituality

The Jury: Moral Innovation or Historic Relic?

Moral Maze by BBC

Dec 4, 202556:29Religion & Spirituality

The jury trial has been around for almost 1,000 years. Magna Carta, in 1215, enshrined the principle that “No free man shall be... imprisoned… except by the lawful judgement of his peers.” That could be about to change,...

About This Episode

The Jury: Moral Innovation or Historic Relic? is an episode from Moral Maze by BBC. The jury trial has been around for almost 1,000 years. Magna Carta, in 1215, enshrined the principle that “No free man shall be... imprisoned… except by the...

Podcast

This episode belongs to Moral Maze.

Listen Online

Use the player on this page to stream the episode online.

Episode Details

Published Dec 4, 2025, 56:29 long, audio available.

Questions About This Episode

What is The Jury: Moral Innovation or Historic Relic? about?

The jury trial has been around for almost 1,000 years. Magna Carta, in 1215, enshrined the principle that “No free man shall be... imprisoned… except by the lawful judgement of his peers.” That could be about to change, under the proposal by the Justice Secretary, David Lammy, to restrict jury trials to the most serious cases. The aim is to deal with an unprecedented backlog in the courts. Britain, thus far, has been in the minority: most countries around the world rely on judges – not juries – to evaluate the evidence, assess guilt, and deliver justice. Those in favour of juries see them as a moral institution, putting justice in the hands of randomly-selected ordinary people, rather than those of the state or a legal elite, and so reducing the chance of a biased or blinkered verdict. Opponents argue that juries can be obstacles to justice, not immune to prejudiced decisions, and lacking the expertise to weigh up the evidence in complex cases. While some see the jury system as a redundant relic of the past, others believe the deliberative democratic principle it embodies should be extended to other areas of public life in innovative ways. Should we, as some suggest, replace the House of Lords with a second chamber full of randomly-selected representative voters? Those in favour of citizen juries in politics, as well as in the governance of public institutions, believe they can provide greater democratic legitimacy and lead to better decisions, through a combination of lived experience and expert guidance. Those against citizen juries say they undermine a fundamental democratic principle: one person, one vote. Chair: Michael Buerk Panel: Matthew Taylor, Inaya Folarin-Iman, Tim Stanley and Mona Siddiqui Witnesses: Sir Simon Jenkins, Fiona Rutherford, Anna Coote and Tom Simpson Producer: Dan Tierney.

Where can I listen to The Jury: Moral Innovation or Historic Relic??

You can listen to The Jury: Moral Innovation or Historic Relic? online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.

Which podcast is The Jury: Moral Innovation or Historic Relic? from?

The Jury: Moral Innovation or Historic Relic? is an episode from Moral Maze by BBC.

How long is this episode?

This episode is 56:29 long.

When was this episode published?

This episode was published on Dec 4, 2025.

Can I save The Jury: Moral Innovation or Historic Relic? for later?

Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.

Are there related episodes from Moral Maze?

Yes. This page shows related episodes from Moral Maze when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.

Quick Answers About This Episode

Where can I listen to The Jury: Moral Innovation or Historic Relic??

You can listen to The Jury: Moral Innovation or Historic Relic? on this page when the episode audio is available from the podcast feed.

Which podcast is this episode from?

The Jury: Moral Innovation or Historic Relic? is from Moral Maze by BBC.

What are the episode details?

Published Dec 4, 2025 and 56:29 long