Philanthropy from Aristotle to Zuckerberg, with Paul Vallely

In this episode we talk to Paul Vallely, author of Philanthropy: From Aristotle to Zuckerberg about his new book and what we can learn from history that can help inform our understanding of modern philanthropy and our thinking about where it should go in the future. Including: What value does a historical perspective bring? Would people working in philanthropy/civil society would benefit from more historical perspective? What is the fundamental distinction between the Greco-Roman tradition of philanthropy and that which emerged from the Abrahamic religions, and why it is still important in understanding philanthropy today? What does history tell us about the relationship between charity and justice: i.e. do they exist in opposition, or is charity a means of delivering justice? How is this debate is reflected in the history of philanthropy, and why does it remain relevant today? How have views on the nature of poverty shaped philanthropy? I.e. Is poverty seen as a moral failing on the part of the individual, or a structural flaw in society? Are poverty & inequality "problems to be solved" or merely part of the natural order that accords some wealth and some poverty- and what does this mean for the role of charity? As we see controversy once again about "Victorian attitudes" towards the "deserving and undeserving poor", are these issues that we need to grapple with in thinking about philanthropy? What can we learn from history about the question of "tainted donations", and the extent to which the way in which wealth has been created determines the legitimacy of trying to do good through giving it away? What is the distinction the book draws between "strategic" & "reciprocal" philanthropy? It is clearly almost impossible to understand the history of philanthropy without understanding some theology, as religion and charity were inextricably entwined for a long time. But what role does religion play in driving and shaping modern philanthropy? The freedom that philanthropy and civil society have to run counter to the status quo or the policies and public opinion of a particular time has been a key part of driving historic social change. How do we preserve this freedom, whilst also answering concerns that unchecked philanthropic power could end up being anti-democratic? What is the core role of philanthropy within society which differentiates it from either state or market provision? The book speaks approvingly of celebrity activists (making the point that they are in some ways following the template set by the original "philanthropist" John Howard). What role can this kind of philanthropy play? Why is it often viewed somewhat cynically? Related Links Philanthropy: From Aristotle to Zuckerberg website Guardian extract from Paul's book, " How Philanthropy Benefits the Super-Rich " Paul's blog for NPC " Why history should matter to philanthropists and philanthropy professionals " Paul on BBC Radio Three's Free Thinking . Paul's Jewish Chronicle piece, " Tzedakah: a concept that changed the world " Rhod's book, Public Good by Private Means (and free PDF version ) Our CAF Giving Thought podcast with Beth Breeze Our CAF Giving Thought podcast with Ben Soskis Our CAF Giving Thought podcast with Andrew Rudd Rhod's World Economic Forum article, " Philanthropy is at a turning point. Here are 6 ways it could go "

You can listen to Philanthropy from Aristotle to Zuckerberg, with Paul Vallely online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.

Philanthropy from Aristotle to Zuckerberg, with Paul Vallely is an episode from Giving Thought by Giving Thought.

This episode is 01:12:09 long.

This episode was published on Nov 10, 2020.

Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.

Yes. This page shows related episodes from Giving Thought when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.