How A 1989 Broadcasting Law Became An Internet Speech Rule - with Steven Franks

We break down the Broadcasting Standards Authority’s claim that it can regulate online platforms under the Broadcasting Act 1989, even though Parliament never updated the law for the internet. We talk through why that change threatens open debate, why the standards are so subjective, and why we think this fight matters for free speech in New Zealand. • the BSA asserting jurisdiction over online speech via an old statute • why broadcast standards existed in a scarce spectrum era • how the internet breaks the logic of compulsory audiences and balance rules • the subjectivity of “good taste and decency” and why it becomes a power tool • Tikanga flashpoints and the idea of modern “heresy trials” • inconsistencies in targeting small outlets while excluding major platforms • the practical mess of defining audiences and applying on-demand exceptions • the chilling effect of complaints, process costs, and potential fines • political and international risks if New Zealand is seen to censor platforms • why we say we have to fight and what could come next If you enjoyed this episode, please

You can listen to How A 1989 Broadcasting Law Became An Internet Speech Rule - with Steven Franks online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.

How A 1989 Broadcasting Law Became An Internet Speech Rule - with Steven Franks is an episode from Free Speech Union's Podcast by Free Speech Union.

This episode is 16:48 long.

This episode was published on Apr 1, 2026.

Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.

Yes. This page shows related episodes from Free Speech Union's Podcast when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.