How Rwanda judged its genocide

Since 2001, the gacaca community courts have been the centrepiece of Rwanda’s justice and reconciliation process. Nearly every adult Rwandan has participated in the trials, but lawyers are banned from any official involvement. Human rights organisations fiercely opposed the use of gacaca for trying genocide cases, on the grounds that it fell short of international legal standards of fairness. Much criticism reflects legal rigidity towards the unprecedented challenges confronting post-genocide Rwanda - and a limited understanding of the aims of the community courts. Gacaca was inevitably imperfect, but also highly ambitious and innovative. While the full impact of the process will not be apparent for many years, gacaca has delivered benefits to Rwandans in the spheres of justice, truth and democratic participation. Other societies confronting the aftermath of mass conflict could learn much from Rwanda’s approach to local justice. Read by Edward Paice - Director, Africa Research Institute

You can listen to How Rwanda judged its genocide online on Radio and Podcast. Open the player on this page to stream the available audio.

How Rwanda judged its genocide is an episode from Africa Research Institute by Jonathan Bhalla.

This episode is 27:53 long.

This episode was published on May 9, 2012.

Yes. Use the heart button on the episode page to add it to your favorite episodes list.

Yes. This page shows related episodes from Africa Research Institute when more episodes are available from the podcast feed.